- Status
Timeline: Rep. Devin Nunes and Ukraine Disinformation Efforts
https://www.justsecurity.org/67480/timeline-rep-devin-nunes-and-ukraine-disinformation-efforts/
Giuliani associate Parnas wants to testify that Nunes aides hid Ukraine meetings on Biden dirt from Schiff
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/24/giu...taffers-hid-ukraine-meetings-from-schiff.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/67480/timeline-rep-devin-nunes-and-ukraine-disinformation-efforts/
Giuliani associate Parnas wants to testify that Nunes aides hid Ukraine meetings on Biden dirt from Schiff
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/24/giu...taffers-hid-ukraine-meetings-from-schiff.html
Why Giuliani Singled Out 2 Ukrainian Oligarchs to Help Look for Dirt
"VIENNA — They were two Ukrainian oligarchs with American legal problems. One had been indicted on federal bribery charges. The other was embroiled in a vast banking scandal and was reported to be under investigation by the F.B.I.
And they had one more thing in common: Both had been singled out by Rudolph W. Giuliani and pressed to assist in his wide-ranging hunt for information damaging to one of President Trump’s leading political rivals, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr."
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/25/us/giuliani-ukraine-oligarchs.html
"VIENNA — They were two Ukrainian oligarchs with American legal problems. One had been indicted on federal bribery charges. The other was embroiled in a vast banking scandal and was reported to be under investigation by the F.B.I.
And they had one more thing in common: Both had been singled out by Rudolph W. Giuliani and pressed to assist in his wide-ranging hunt for information damaging to one of President Trump’s leading political rivals, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr."
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/25/us/giuliani-ukraine-oligarchs.html
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD F. MCGAHN II,
Defendant.
Civ. No. 19-cv-2379 (KBJ)
"Stated simply, the primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded
American history is that Presidents are not kings. See The Federalist No. 51 (James
Madison); The Federalist No. 69 (Alexander Hamilton); 1 Alexis de Tocqueville,
Democracy in America 115–18 (Harvey C. Mansfield & Delba Winthrop eds. & trans.,
Univ. of Chicago Press 2000) (1835). This means that they do not have subjects, bound
by loyalty or blood, whose destiny they are entitled to control. Rather, in this land of
liberty, it is indisputable that current and former employees of the White House work
for the People of the United States, and that they take an oath to protect and defend the
Constitution of the United States. Moreover, as citizens of the United States, current
and former senior-level presidential aides have constitutional rights, including the right
to free speech, and they retain these rights even after they have transitioned back into
private life."
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6560656-JACKSON-MCGAHN-RULING.html
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD F. MCGAHN II,
Defendant.
Civ. No. 19-cv-2379 (KBJ)
"Stated simply, the primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded
American history is that Presidents are not kings. See The Federalist No. 51 (James
Madison); The Federalist No. 69 (Alexander Hamilton); 1 Alexis de Tocqueville,
Democracy in America 115–18 (Harvey C. Mansfield & Delba Winthrop eds. & trans.,
Univ. of Chicago Press 2000) (1835). This means that they do not have subjects, bound
by loyalty or blood, whose destiny they are entitled to control. Rather, in this land of
liberty, it is indisputable that current and former employees of the White House work
for the People of the United States, and that they take an oath to protect and defend the
Constitution of the United States. Moreover, as citizens of the United States, current
and former senior-level presidential aides have constitutional rights, including the right
to free speech, and they retain these rights even after they have transitioned back into
private life."
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6560656-JACKSON-MCGAHN-RULING.html
- Status