Chris Firestarter Jul 26, 2016 #1 Jul 26, 2016 5 12 3 Jul 26, 2016 #1 Likes: NanoTechnician, Fryepod, MollilMayhem and 3 others
NimbusCloud Commander Jul 26, 2016 #2 Jul 26, 2016 73 132 33 Brisbane, Australia Jul 26, 2016 #2 I say anything bigger than 16-inch (406 mm) is getting a bit Aggressive.
Chris Firestarter Jul 26, 2016 #3 Jul 26, 2016 5 12 3 Jul 26, 2016 #3 Um... well this seems a lot larger than 16-inch
Wyntyr Omni Ace Ark Liege Jul 26, 2016 #4 Jul 26, 2016 6,336 11,602 113 Florida Jul 26, 2016 #4 This is a tad aggressive I think... Likes: Chez Stevaughn's and Faeryl
TankHunter678 Well-Known Member Jul 26, 2016 #5 Jul 26, 2016 369 311 63 Jul 26, 2016 #5 Chris said: Um... well this seems a lot larger than 16-inch Click to expand... Those are 16 inch guns. The US Navy has never had a warship with larger then 16 inch guns. Largely in part to using high velocity ammunition the Iowa-class was not rated (defensively) against.
Chris said: Um... well this seems a lot larger than 16-inch Click to expand... Those are 16 inch guns. The US Navy has never had a warship with larger then 16 inch guns. Largely in part to using high velocity ammunition the Iowa-class was not rated (defensively) against.
Chris Firestarter Jul 27, 2016 #6 Jul 26, 2016 5 12 3 Jul 27, 2016 #6 woo so its as aggressive as it can be without being too aggressive.
Pandagnome Kaiju Slayer Fart Siege Welcome Wagon Happy Kaiju Sep 27, 2016 #7 Jul 27, 2016 7,894 10,171 113 Island of Tofu Sep 27, 2016 #7
NanoTechnician Veteran Sep 28, 2016 #8 Jul 26, 2016 383 606 93 Australia nanohq.wordpress.com Sep 28, 2016 #8 These guns aren't too aggressive; but the ports are way too exposed. Likes: Torgue_Joey
