I take issue with the female skins

[liandri]

That would be too much work, having two variants of each skin. We already have about 20 player character skins, and more are in the works. Getting SFW variants for every single one would be cumbersome.
Besides, SFW is subjective. An artist can never define the threshold for SFW. It is a lot easier to have a single default skin for everyone that doesn't want to see the 'flavor' skins.
Grummz has mentioned several times that he intends to have the option of muting individual skins, as well as the option to mute a general theme. This gives the player the option to pick and choose the skins they want to see, in-game.

This. The ideal situation would be to provided SFW versions of each skin since it would make more sense from both player's perspectives. You could still play the character you want to and communicate with others as that character, and other players would still see your model but less 'sexualised'/non-lore. But it would take way too much time, not only the new models and the code to ensure it all works, but the individual SFW skins would need their own customization options as well. What if you liked how a SFW skin's pants looked, but preferred the bustier NSFW top? They almost become separate skins by that point.

Seeing the default geesuit is the best option and solves the issue. Just which geesuit to use?

 

[Valaetoshiru]

Just which geesuit to use?

The sexier one, of course.

 

[missinglink#3172]

Just to point out that it was the 1990s that was the big bad bare babes era of entertainment.

Barb Wire - 1996

Lady Death first showed up in 1991, video release in 2004

etc

The majority of the 1980's were mostly big hair and shoulder pads. Providing such icons as

Sarah Conner, 1984 - Terminator

and of course Ripley, 1986 - Aliens

Of course there's various examples of but positive and negative in both eras, but I get the feeling you were thinking more 1990s.

 

[random1298#7393]

Me, I just don't want my wife to catch me playing thinking it's porn.

What if she does? is she going to kick you out of the house or put a padlock to the mancave shed outside your garden?

Just to point out that it was the 1990s that was the big bad bare babes era of entertainment.

Indeed it was, and what great times they were. It was a time when entertainment medium creators/producers/artists had genuine free creativity and expression.

Nowadays in the West, if any creator in the professional entertainment industry even tried to produce anything with "hot babes" he would immediately get lynch-mobbed, cancelled and black-marked from the industry from the you-know-who brigade.

Event models in the West such as Car babes, Booth Babes, Grid Girls, Boxing Ring Babes, Darts Walk-on Ladies, Page 3, etc. are now just a distinct and fond memory from the past as traditional culture continues to be eroded by the Mob every passing day.

 

[Pandagnome]

What if she does? is she going to kick you out of the house or put a padlock to the mancave shed outside your garden?

Perhaps could have more ammo to complain about something i am just guessing here hmm

Nowadays in the West, if any creator in the professional entertainment industry even tried to produce anything with "hot babes" he would immediately get lynch-mobbed, cancelled and black-marked from the industry from the you-know-who brigade.

However its confusing to see so called music artists that reveal just as much and get away without the cancelling strange that.

The world is not as it was and for that reason a man cave is good just ask batman he has the batcave!

 

[random1298#7393]

However its confusing to see so called music artists that reveal just as much and get away without the
cancelling strange that.

That's because the female music artists spew the same Fem talking points, and when they reveal themselves it is "for themselves" and to "feel good". It is seen as "confidence", "empowerment", "I don't need no man", "being baddass", "expressing herself", etc.

It becomes a massive problem for the Fems if women reveal themselves for the purpose of being eye-candy to please men, which the roles/jobs I mentioned in my previous post are for. That's when it suddenly becomes "sexism", "objectification", "degrading", "misogyny", etc. against women.

The world is not as it was and for that reason a man cave is good!

A man cave isn't good, at all. On the surface it sounds good (because it's an area for the man to have/put his stuff and have fun), but what it really means is that his wife or girlfriend is in control and has the rest of the house or apartment to herself.

It's even worse when a man uses an outside shed or outbuilding as the man cave, as it means that his wife or girlfriend has the entire house to herself.

 

[Pandagnome]

It's even worse when a man uses an outside shed or outbuilding as the man cave, as it means that his wife or girlfriend has the entire house to herself.

Perhaps or then again it could just be a side project that has turned into a little space away from the home.
Just because someone is partnered / Married doesn't mean they have to be always together some space can be good too.

A house is for the family yes, if that is the case then it isn't a good thing for one to have the entire house for themself!

That's because the female music artists spew the same Fem talking points, and when they reveal themselves it is "for themselves" and to "feel good". It is seen as "confidence", "empowerment", "I don't need no man", "being baddass", "expressing herself", etc.

It becomes a massive problem for the Fems if women reveal themselves for the purpose of being eye-candy to please men, which the roles/jobs I mentioned in my previous post are for. That's when it suddenly becomes "sexism", "objectification", "degrading", "misogyny", etc. against women.

Ah i see what you mean

This video also helped.

 

[random1298#7393]

Perhaps or then again it could just be a side project that has turned into a little space away from the home.

Just because someone is partnered / Married doesn't mean they have to be always together some space can be good too.

Yeah. The guy should be eternally grateful that he got permission to have his own little space in a house/property that was likely paid for by himself or has a joint ownership on the deeds.

A house is for the family yes, if that is the case then it isn't a good thing for one to have the entire house for themself!

If there is a mancave at a property then it is an indication that a person is having the entire or most of the house to herself.

 

[Pandagnome]

Yeah. The guy should be eternally grateful that he got permission to have his own little space in a house/property that was likely paid for by himself or has a joint ownership on the deeds.

Could be the other way round too!

If there is a mancave at a property then it is an indication that a person is having the entire or most of the house to herself.

Not always i knew a neighbour who would go there just to smoke weed so that if the kids get back the house was not smelling of that.

 

[random1298#7393]

Could be the other way round too!

Oh I don't know about that, considering that there isn't such a thing/term as a "womancave".

(if there was, I'd imagine there would be a massive outrage and social media protests against it claiming "misogyny"; and any properties/houses which have a "womancave" would have the husband/boyfrriend of it arrested and jailed)

Not always i knew a neighbour who would go there just to smoke weed so that if the kids get back the house was not smelling of that.

That's pretty much just a case of "going outside for a smoke", it is not the same thing.

 

[Ronyn]

Ah yes the necro to rehash issues that have been discussed repeatedly. heh
let's move on folks.