Yes, I know that. When I say "ideal male body" and "ideal female body", I meant that in the way of how mainstream media, society and culture generally depicts them. I guess I should have made that clearer.
The "ideal male body" now is always the same as it has been for decades. Basically, it's the "three 6's" - 6ft tall or over; 6-pac; and a 6-figure annual salary. (you can disregard the last one as we are talking about bodies of course). Basically a more muscular and refined version of Michaelangelo's David statue, or an "Adonis" as "buff guys" are usually referred to. Or maybe even He-Man or Conan The Barbarian. This remains the ideal body type for men to this day.
The "ideal female body" used to be pretty much the "Baywatch type" females, such as Pamela Anderson when she was in it. But then as the Fem cancer gradually took over, now the ideal female body is anything BUT that, and instead being overweight/fat (not to mention being unattractive or even ugly) is promoted and glorified because you know, "muh Body Positivity" and "muh Diversity", and trying to fear-monger convince men to drop any standards they have to date them (otherwise they are chauvinists, shallow, misogynistic, etc). While they have the right of free speech to promote this rubbish, what is insufferable is that once again, it is only something that only exclusively applies to women.
More double standards are added due to the fact that women are encouraged by the Fems to always raise and keep their standards high and go for the "best" (the three 6's) when it comes to dating men. This attitude is seen as "you go girl!", "empowahing" and "she knows what she wants". If men did the same regarding dating women ("the three B's" - Beautiful, big Boobs, nice Booty), then it's suddenly seen as "shallow", "chavanistic" and "misogynistic".
Therefore based on the above, I retain my stance that it is much harder for a man to achieve the "ideal male body" than it does for a woman to achieve the "ideal female body".
The "ideal male body" now is always the same as it has been for decades. Basically, it's the "three 6's" - 6ft tall or over; 6-pac; and a 6-figure annual salary. (you can disregard the last one as we are talking about bodies of course). Basically a more muscular and refined version of Michaelangelo's David statue, or an "Adonis" as "buff guys" are usually referred to. Or maybe even He-Man or Conan The Barbarian. This remains the ideal body type for men to this day.
The "ideal female body" used to be pretty much the "Baywatch type" females, such as Pamela Anderson when she was in it. But then as the Fem cancer gradually took over, now the ideal female body is anything BUT that, and instead being overweight/fat (not to mention being unattractive or even ugly) is promoted and glorified because you know, "muh Body Positivity" and "muh Diversity", and trying to fear-monger convince men to drop any standards they have to date them (otherwise they are chauvinists, shallow, misogynistic, etc). While they have the right of free speech to promote this rubbish, what is insufferable is that once again, it is only something that only exclusively applies to women.
More double standards are added due to the fact that women are encouraged by the Fems to always raise and keep their standards high and go for the "best" (the three 6's) when it comes to dating men. This attitude is seen as "you go girl!", "empowahing" and "she knows what she wants". If men did the same regarding dating women ("the three B's" - Beautiful, big Boobs, nice Booty), then it's suddenly seen as "shallow", "chavanistic" and "misogynistic".
Therefore based on the above, I retain my stance that it is much harder for a man to achieve the "ideal male body" than it does for a woman to achieve the "ideal female body".
Last edited:
