It looks like it was designed to be shiny first, and usable maybe 3rd or 4th. It's VERY pretty, but:
- the front page fails WCAG miserably;
- contrast in some sections is horrible;
- moving image backgrounds make it
harder to read text;
- no obvious option to change back to a list layout;
This is all from the front page btw.
Examples:
View attachment 1486
Contrast fail
View attachment 1487
an example of WCAG failure, 9 errors isn't so bad and hopefully easy to fix, but those contrast failures
(contrast is part of WCAG, but it's so egregious I had to list it twice, sorry)
Here is a list of WCAG checkers you can use:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/
The usual advise is to pick one, and standardise your team on it as they're all subtly different.