Should crafting resources be the currency we use?

Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#41
You really don't -need- to break a global currency so long as you create ways to remove it from a players wallet.

I have no problem with additional currencies but feel they are best left used to aquire things outside of the economy.

If Ember uses Credits. That's it. No need to worry about currecy X for area A and currency Y for area B and then worse currency Z for area C.

If we had additional currencies I would really only wish to see them be temporary and for a specifc purpose.

Currently in WoW they are adding a currency usable only for rewards for the pre-patch content leading into Legion expansion. Fun currencies are great and add more life and things to progress on and earn.

In short; Having to rely on multiple sources of currency separated in different levels of content will suck; or one currency simply becomes obsolete and thus we wonder why we have it.
I regret ever making that post. Can we pretend it never happened?
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#43
I do not know how feasible it is but just a thought...

I believe that two major reasons for hyperinflation is trading markets and gold farmers, So what if you removed these from the game? What I would like to suggest is that instead everyone sells their extra resources to an NPC merchant for whatever currency the NPC uses, and can use that currency to buy other resources from the same NPC merchant. The AI will adjust the prices of commodities based on how much is bought and sold to them, thus allowing players to still have an affect. Players will no longer be entirely at the mercy of what other players have pulled out of the ground and at the same time gold farmers have NO WAY TO SELL <money> because there is no direct trading between players. With no way to directly sell gold or items and no power leveling to be done the game would not have many gold farmers.

Sure you can say that it would hurt crafters, but that is not actually true because the NPC merchant would also buy their crafted gear, and based on supply it could be worth a lot or not so much. This is also a good means for the dev's to keep control over the marketplace through markups. The difference between buying and selling a specific item might be say 20%, but if there starts to be too many resources or too much currency it could easily be bumped up to 25% etc.. It also means that there will never NOT be a resource or item available because the merchant technically has infinite resources, albeit the price might be crazy high if what you want is not being sold at all. Still you can have what you want when you want it as long as you are willing to pay for it. So it comes down to which is the better option for the individual player, mining a resource out of the ground which requires time, or paying for the resource which requires money.
Simpler to just use mats for cash and not allow flipping in the market (AH). If you don't allow someone to buy up all of a certain mat and relist it at a higher price (flipping) you've solved 90% of the issues that can plague an AH. And it won't really hurt crafters at all.

The only real issue there is you have to have a large enough player base to keep the crafters supplied.

Gold farmers just exacerbate an issue that already gets pretty bad without help.
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#44
You can delete it, but don't do it - be a man! :D Still, pretty good discussion took place after that so it's all good
I'm just concerned it's a dead end that's detracting from the original idea. I let myself be baited into trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Edit: Still, I guess I'll leave it.
 

Excess

Commander
Jul 27, 2016
10
7
3
#46
OP: Yes please I likes my moneys. What if the resource gathering is just something half the players don't really enjoy or get bored with. What would they have to continue on? Cold cash that's what.

Currency can be removed from the game through buy back schemes, or events. War funding type events *ahem*. Think every holiday a vender pops up and there is stuff to buy, temp costumes fireworks, other stuff people like to use to bullshit around with eachother. A sink doesn't necessary have to revolve entirely around game mechanics to remove the stuff. Lots and lots of fun ways just have to storm them up.
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#47
OP: Yes please I likes my moneys. What if the resource gathering is just something half the players don't really enjoy or get bored with. What would they have to continue on? Cold cash that's what.
Um, resource gathering is the centerpiece of the game. Putting the mining units (T.H.M.P.R.s) out there and defending them is why our characters are there. Everyone will have resources, and many will use them.

I do like your idea about buying holiday items though.
 

NeoUSMCVet

Omega Founder
Jul 28, 2016
8
12
3
39
Colorado
#48
I firmly believe as some would say is a fixed price model. The more of one item increases value by a percentage of availability. For example if a market has an item whose base value is 100 credits. and there are 1000 items with a player number of 4000. the availability of that is 1/4 the population.

Lets say that 25% is the highest and lowest an item would be. and lets say that 25% of the population is the lowest and 75% is the highest.

1000 items for 4000 players makes the item only available to 25% of the players, meaning that 75% (our 75% mark) of the population cannot purchase this on the market. The price of the item would be 125 (25% of 100 is 25) rather than 100 due to the items rarity.

3000 of that same item would be the opposite of our price model. since availability of the item is 75% the cost of the item would be 75 rather than 100 due to how common the item is. Below the threshold you add, above you subtract.

Keep in mind this is merely a concept or example of fixed market. This also prevents Gold Sellers and Botters from causing market inflation.

The market in turn would always be changing based on the amount of players buying and selling items. Over a period of Years the games market will always be the same and no player will have an advantage over another based on the price of an item.

Thats just my 2 cents.
 

Sik San

Deepscanner
Jul 26, 2016
112
86
28
#49
The market in turn would always be changing based on the amount of players buying and selling items. Over a period of Years the games market will always be the same and no player will have an advantage over another based on the price of an item.

Thats just my 2 cents.
Fixed prices is bad and also unnatural idea. If you're denying supply and demand - your economy is doomed.

With prices fixed all the goods on AH or from npc vendors going to be ultra cheap in a year, since ppl gonna grind money every day while prices gonna be the same.
 
Likes: TGVirus
Jul 26, 2016
23
17
3
#50
Really nice to have a common currency in game. When I think of a purely barter system it brings me back to diablo 2 where sojs were the currency. It was nice to be able to trade for specific perfect items. Fun system but took inventory space and essentially just had to carry the sojs to trade. Really like barter systems, one item always ends up in hot demand.

If the stats dont vary like in FF then the market is nice for the most part. Although should be able to lower the sell value at no cost (so people dont undercut by 1 credit on a 99k item).

Sink. Why not release seasonal/holiday items requiring the main currency but rather than price it at 5,000 credits have it priced at 1% of credits in the game at the time of purchase. OFC %'s would need to drop as people may become inactive.
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#51
I firmly believe as some would say is a fixed price model.
I dislike fixed markets. I believe it is not only possible, but easy, to prevent the market from becoming a PvP playground or a gold farmer's dream.

All you have to do is tag each item that comes from the market and keep tagged items from being put back on the market. This prevents players from buying items a seller has priced low and relisting them for a higher price. It also prevents buying up all the stocks of one item and taking control of one sector of the market that way.
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#52
Really nice to have a common currency in game. When I think of a purely barter system it brings me back to diablo 2 where sojs were the currency. It was nice to be able to trade for specific perfect items. Fun system but took inventory space and essentially just had to carry the sojs to trade. Really like barter systems, one item always ends up in hot demand.

If the stats dont vary like in FF then the market is nice for the most part. Although should be able to lower the sell value at no cost (so people dont undercut by 1 credit on a 99k item).

Sink. Why not release seasonal/holiday items requiring the main currency but rather than price it at 5,000 credits have it priced at 1% of credits in the game at the time of purchase. OFC %'s would need to drop as people may become inactive.
I call this idea a barter system for simplicity. In reality the crafting mats would become the currency, so you're not forced to barter weapon A for shield B to make a trade. Someone who's crafted Weapon A would list it on the market for X amount of material Z.
 
Jul 26, 2016
23
17
3
#53
I call this idea a barter system for simplicity. In reality the crafting mats would become the currency, so you're not forced to barter weapon A for shield B to make a trade. Someone who's crafted Weapon A would list it on the market for X amount of material Z.
So if im selling weapon x i would list it as
(__ material a) or (__ material b) or (__ material c) or (__ material a and __ material b) ... etc?

I think a higher demanded material will always come on top.. so why not just have a high demand currency
__ material a -> currency -> item
item -> currency -> __ material a

Dont need to keep currency on your account and can instantly trade it off for whatever you want, makes it easier to program the marketplace with a common currency, just need good sinks to keep hyper inflation out
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#54
So if im selling weapon x i would list it as
(__ material a) or (__ material b) or (__ material c) or (__ material a and __ material b) ... etc?

I think a higher demanded material will always come on top.. so why not just have a high demand currency
__ material a -> currency -> item
item -> currency -> __ material a

Dont need to keep currency on your account and can instantly trade it off for whatever you want, makes it easier to program the marketplace with a common currency, just need good sinks to keep hyper inflation out
If I were designing the market I'd force the listing as X <rare name> Y <uncommon name> Z <common name> just to keep it from being too unwieldy.

Yes, unless the crafting system is perfectly designed some mats will be in higher demand for crafting. Which is why I'd have vendors simply take R/U/C mats rather than specifying which R/U/C, so the player won't get stuck with 20 million McGuffinite while every crafter is demanding Unobtanium on the market.

And the crafting mats are a defacto currency regardless of whether a fiat currency exists or not. A fiat currency may be simpler, but is also more prone to inflation since there is less to consume it, and drops will be exchanged for fiat currency. There's a reason that RL currencies should be tied to a physical standard such as precious metals. I'd love to see this tried in a game universe as well.
 
Jul 26, 2016
23
17
3
#55
Which is why I'd have vendors simply take R/U/C mats rather than specifying which R/U/C
So all crafting materials exchange at the same rate? Why bother having multiple crafting mats then if you can exchange them all 1:1

edit : Think ember is only going to drop crafting materials and not actual gear. So the prices on the market would be determined by the crafters.. I mod'd the market in firefall to show me the current costs of crafting materials so I would know if it was better to buy or craft things and what to list items at
 
Last edited:
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#56
So all crafting materials exchange at the same rate? Why bother having multiple crafting mats then if you can exchange them all 1:1

edit : Think ember is only going to drop crafting materials and not actual gear. So the prices on the market would be determined by the crafters.. I mod'd the market in firefall to show me the current costs of crafting materials so I would know if it was better to buy or craft things and what to list items at
Maybe I didn't expound on this earlier in the thread.

I'd have vendors "buy" R/U/C mats for a value of $10/$5/$1 credit for offworld goods. Everything made locally will be purchased with refined mats. The seller in the AH can specify a number of one type of Rare material, and a number of one type of Uncommon material, and a number of one type of Common material.

Some Rare mat will be in higher demand locally. I have never seen a crafting system where all Rare mats were used equally. The vendors accepting any Rare as a Rare reflects the more diversified demand from offworld as well as consuming excess of the less used materials. Same for Uncommon and Common.

Edit:
Just to clarify, I did not intend for people to think that a vendor could exchange 1 of Rare A for 1 of Rare B. The sole role the vendor would fill is to be our broker for offworld goods.
 
Jul 26, 2016
23
17
3
#57
Maybe I didn't expound on this earlier in the thread.

I'd have vendors "buy" R/U/C mats for a value of $10/$5/$1 credit for offworld goods. Everything made locally will be purchased with refined mats. The seller in the AH can specify a number of one type of Rare material, and a number of one type of Uncommon material, and a number of one type of Common material.
So basically create 3 forms of currency to sell things for on the market, then trade the vendor for the fluctuating price of materials?.. players are good at creating fluctuating prices in the market.. really not sure how this would be different in the long run..
 
Jul 28, 2016
144
137
43
#58
So basically create 3 forms of currency to sell things for on the market, then trade the vendor for the fluctuating price of materials?.. players are good at creating fluctuating prices in the market.. really not sure how this would be different in the long run..
Now if you want to talk about the market like that the focus of the conversation will change.

Players create fluctuations in price by manipulating price and availability of goods. Crafting mats are what is most commonly manipulated, but if there are key pieces of gear for given level ranges they'll get manipulated too.

The most common form of manipulation is flipping. Find something, buy all of it, relist all of it at a higher price. When you control the supply you can set whatever price you like. This is why monopolies are illegal IRL. The solution here is twofold. In the first place, if you make crafting mats the currency, flippers can not corner the market on them because they aren't ON the market. The second part is to simply flag every item that is bought on the market, then not allow flagged items to be listed.

Between these two controls you can let the market find its own level. Actually, only one of them is a control, the other is a removal of a middleman.

Edit: Added last sentence.
 

TankHunter678

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2016
369
311
63
#59
So basically create 3 forms of currency to sell things for on the market, then trade the vendor for the fluctuating price of materials?.. players are good at creating fluctuating prices in the market.. really not sure how this would be different in the long run..
Rate of removal from the system.

With a singular currency you need to keep inventing ways, and trying to incentivize the use of those ways, to burn the currency out of peoples pockets.

Using the crafting materials themselves as the currency means they get burned out of the system naturally. People will always be crafting something, hunting materials to make their dream build, or hunting for materials to make a build to see if it would work.

So in this selling the materials to vendors gets you offworld goods that would otherwise cost credits, buying and selling materials with other players means those materials leave the market because a person was looking for those materials to use them to make something.

With a singular currency the only natural removal of the currency is through vendors or taxes on the market. Vendors wont always be selling things that players want to buy often. Sales tax on the market does little to stop inflation since money is infinitely generated.
 
Jul 26, 2016
23
17
3
#60
Crafting mats are what is most commonly manipulated,
So having a vendor exchange them at a variable exchange rate would be better?

if there are key pieces of gear for given level ranges they'll get manipulated too.

The most common form of manipulation is flipping. Find something, buy all of it, relist all of it at a higher price. When you control the supply you can set whatever price you like.
If the only gear going on the market is from crafting people would likely undercut the manipulators and the manipulation would end up just costing them. Flipping something sold undervalue isn't necessarily a bad thing, someone desperate to sell at a low price is fine in a market.

Really not sure what this is getting towards, done bumping this thread. I'm for a single currency.