[SUGGESTION] Taking inspiration from Armored Core

Tragedy

ARES Operator
Jul 26, 2016
39
64
18
California, America
#1
@Grummz If you've never played Armored Core, I recommend you try out Armored Core For Answer and Armored Core Verdict Day for the most modern mechanics. Here are my suggestions for mechanics that I thought worked well in Armored Core. They are all just suggestions, so you can ignore or modify those you dislike at will. I tried to make this as readable and understandable as possible and left out many details (so don't rage at me Armored Core/Battletech fans.)



~Weight allocation~
(distinguishing Omniframe Light/Medium/Heavy classes)

There are some current visions for what the differences will be between Light/Medium/Heavy Omniframes, and I'd like to expand on that.

In armored core you had a total weight allocation, that is - your legs, arms and core (torso) could each support a specific amount of weight. In Ember we won't have as customizable mechs as you do in Armored Core, but the same idea could be used in Ember. I propose that the interchangeable components of your omniframe would have an attached weight-value, and the class of your omniframe (heavy/medium/light) would determine your total weight constraints.

Heavy Omniframes would be the most heavily armored mechs, and would have the highest weight allocation. In turn, they would also be the slowest most lumbering mechs, making them huge targets for more agile opponents. Of course, as a Heavy Omniframe pilot you don't care about that, do you? You just want to take your 64-missile battery, and array of artillery launchers and reign hell from the heavens upon the enemies of mankind.

Medium Omniframe pilots value the mobility their omniframes provide them, but also want to take some heavy weaponry into battle - Medium Omniframes sit in between light and heavy mechs in armor, speed and weight allocation - but they are uniquely capable in handling heavy weaponry while also remaining an agile opponent - these are generally the most versatile jack-of-all-trades mechs.

Light Omniframe pilots value mobility and speed before everything else - this is generally the most difficult weight class to play due to having an extremely low weight allocation, thus limiting the amount of weaponry you can field as well as having virtually no armor. A good light omniframe pilot however is near immortal while maintaining their offensive capabilities through precision aiming and calculated tactics.

In short, I propose the addition of "Weight Allocation" to Ember as another way to distinguish the existing Omniframes from one another as well as adding more horizontal choices to the final game.


~Internal Systems~
Armored Core has the concept of Internal components which varies between games, but these are the general internal components shared across many of the titles:

Radiator, Generator, Fire Control System (FCS), Boosters (Jumpjets)


The generator provides the total energy capacity for your mech as well as the total energy regeneration for your mech. This would be equivalent to Jumpjet Energy and Energy Regen in Firefall respectively. The generator also provides a constant stream of energy required for many on-board systems such as the FCS, Camera, Anti-missile systems, etc.

Superior generators are balanced around several factors, but normally the biggest balancing factor is how much they weigh. A generator with a higher energy reserve and output will weigh a considerable amount, to the point where only the largest mechs can support them.

Using this general idea, we can imagine Omniframes will have a general total weight allocation consumed by internal components as well as weapons and other interchangeable components. In essence, the light omniframe will have a lower total weight allocation and a heavy omniframe will have a higher total weight allocation.

I will touch more on this later, for now I just want to lay out some basic ideas and concepts for Generators.


The radiator keeps your mech at supported operational temperatures, simply put: if your mech gets too hot, it won't function at it's full potential, or maybe even at all. This is a feature that has been implemented in many mech simulators, and I'll focus specifically on the mechanics of heat dissipation in Armored Core and Mech Warrior.

Many actions will generate heat or impose heat on your mech, from using your jumpjets and firing your weapons, to heating up from environmental status (Lava, Desert) and receiving enemy fire (Being shot with molten plasma, or being blasted with a flamethrower.) There are many areas where heat generation is a concern and can be included to make a more interesting experience in Ember.

Now if you're familiar with Battletech and Mechwarrior you will know that heat generation is almost impossible to avoid, but in Armored Core radiators are more powerful and a heavy radiator can dissipate most, or even all heat you generate or receive.

What happens when your mech overheats varies between games, in Mechwarrior you enter a state of reactor-shutdown, where your mech is disabled while it vents heat - this may not be a favorable gameplay mechanic in Ember because it takes you out of the action and makes you extremely vulnerable. Armored Core handles overheating a bit differently, instead of becoming disabled you begin taking taking damage based on the thermal conductivity of your mech - I will discuss thermal conductivity later, but the important part for this topic is that you are not disabled, and you simply take damage and must ease off the strenuous activities until you cooldown.

Following with the details of weight allocation I discussed earlier - choosing to equip your mech with a larger, heavier radiator can greatly improve the performance of your mech. You could also choose to sacrifice your ability to effectively dissipate heat and take a smaller, lighter radiator - so that you could take a heavier array of weapons, or maybe a larger generator on your light mech - to put it simply, the addition of radiators and heat generation/dissipation allows for a more horizontal gameplay experience when you have more things to consider in the construction of your omniframe.


The Fire Control System (FCS) is a tricky one, because Ember will be largely skill-based, auto-targeting in Ember doesn't really have a place. In Armored Core, the FCS determines your maximum lock-on range, the maximum number of targets you can acquire while firing missiles, as well as the autonomous weapons systems you may have chosen to bring with you.

While in general I don't think the FCS has a place, it may be an interesting mechanic for autonomous weapons systems, such as Anti-Missile systems, Auto-Turrets and other sentries (think bastion from Firefall,) and other wargear that isn't directly controlled by the player.

The cost for choosing to take a more powerful FCS is a higher energy drain on your generator. As I discussed previously, many activities will naturally drain energy from your generator - but bringing a heavier more powerful generator can offset this cost.


The Boosters in Armored Core had many different shapes and sizes, the general idea is that you could pick a energy efficient booster - this would consume less energy and put out less thrust, ultimately leaving you slower but allowing you to boost significantly longer. Alternatively, there was the energy hog high thrust force boosters that would drain energy insanely fast, but would turn you into a rocketship. This opens up many horizontal options in building your omniframe.

I would also like to discuss two other jumpjet mechanics from Armored Core which were also determined by boosters. Armored Core had two secondary booster functions, "Quick Boost" and "Overboost."

Quickboost was similar to afterburner, almost - it would provide you with a quick high-thrust force boost in whichever direction you desired, at the cost of a good chunk of energy. Weaker Quickboosters required less energy to activate, but wouldn't thrust you as far, etc. (video of quickboost)

Overboosters would provide you with the option to engage a long lasting high thrust booster which would bring your mech to impressive speeds for long distance travel. This would draw an immense amount of energy and produce serious amounts of heat. This ties in with Embers "Skim-mode" as seen in the following section.
(A video containing Overboost, Quickboost and VOB)



~Scan Mode and Limiter Release Mode~
(Omniframe "Skim-mode")

I would like to touch on the omniframe "skim-mode" and it's applications with generators and boosters. As I discussed already, many activities will have a natural energy drain, and if you are not using a powerful generator you will not have very good flight-time.

Armored Core has two variants of Embers Skim-mode, but I will focus only on the direct counterpart "Scan mode," while in Scan Mode most of your hardware is disabled except for the basics. Your FCS, Weapons, Tracking Drones, Advanced camera functionality and other non-essential systems are disabled - leaving you with a significant boost of energy output from your generator, which allows for a significant upgrade on flight-time and overboost/VOB time.

I do not know what all the current plans for Skim mode are in Ember, but you might look at Armored Cores "Scan mode" and "limiter release" modes for ideas on what extra benefits or quirks Skim mode in Ember might provide.


Edit: for the sake of including it, I will briefly discuss what limiter release mode is.
In earlier Armored Core titles you could perform what was known as a "Limiter Release" which would disengage all governors on your mech such as thermal monitors and generator calorific reserves. This would allow you to for a short while perform many maneuvers that are harmful to your mech - namely unlimited energy and improved heat dissipation. This would come at the cost of full reactor-shutdown and significantly decreased heat dissipation for a short while after you activated the Limiter release. This could be a very interesting mechanic in Ember should Radiators and Generators be included in game.


~Overed Weapons~
(Battleframe Ultimate Abilities)

In later releases of Armored Core, weapons known as "Overed Weapons" or "Ultimate Weapons" were introduced. These were akin to Ultimate Abilities in Firefall, in that they were extremely powerful weapons that could not be used often.

Overed Weapons were actually weapons not specifically built for the mechs they were equipped too. They were often industrial construction equipment, or stationary weapon batteries that some crazy guy decided he wanted to equip to his mech. As such, these weapons have a huge cost to activate.

Overed Weapons would operate on two concepts, 1) Thermal Conductivity, 2) Critical Reactor output.

Because Overed Weapons were not built specifically for mechs, they would put huge amounts of strain on the mech when activated. A higher thermal conductivity (which could be supported through a radiator, or some other mechanic you find to be a suitable replacement) would reduce the amount of damage your mech incurs from activating the weapon.

Likewise, the small generator on your mech wasn't built to support those weapons and it takes a long time for the generator to supply energy to the Overed Weapon - this is a problem, because activating the weapon puts massive stress on your machine as well as the downtime you face while waiting for the weapon to power up. A higher "generator critical output" will more rapidly supply energy to the overed weapon so you don't incur as much damage and downtime while waiting for it to power up.

These weapons were single-use in Armored Core, and were often discarded after activation - in Ember you might try some alternative balancing features on how often they are allowed to be used and when they can be used.

All of this is nice, however - what really made the Overed Weapons special is the experience of activating them. Watch the following video and imagine Aero shouting at you that the weapon you're activating is too dangerous, and pleading with you to disengage it.
[Skip to 4m 13s]



~Melee combat~

Melee combat is discussed frequently among the Ember community, I don't have any detailed descriptions of how I envision melee combat because I think videos will do a better job than I can with words. I want Ember to be fast, I want it to be mobility focused - and I think the melee combat should reflect the manoeuvrability and speed you are granted through your Omniframe.





~Pilot progression~
The final thing I would like to touch on from Armored Core is the concept of Pilot progression. (Human+, OP-I)

In earlier titles, the pilot was considered an integral part of the machine. I assume, like Firefall - Ember will allow you to play all Omniframe classes and you will not be bound to a specific Omniframe. I propose adding some pilot skills you acquire overtime, through achievements, community progress, research or however else you see fit. These upgrades would transition between frames, and allow you to play any frame you like without feeling like you're behind on the equipment curve. This adds both more horizontal options, as well as another carrot for the player to chase while they play the game.

For example, should you add a perk system like Firefalls, the perks would not be bound to any one omniframe, but would be attached to your human character.
 
Last edited:
Aug 14, 2016
978
1,554
93
#2
Game immersion is the largest draw to people like me. The games systems, logic, and story all have match will with each other to help us enjoy the game more. It helps the game feel more alive and lived in if the systems in the game line up with the game's lore.

Here is a video talking about what I mean using Armored Core 3 as an example.
 

BunnyHunny

Deepscanner
Aug 20, 2016
127
69
28
#6
Looking at the first video you posted... Something similar could be used in Ember to divide skilled players from less skilled players, for certain fights.

There could be areas, where the only way to get there would be to rush through an open field, while being shit on with ranged attacks.
Movement cripples would be unable to get into the actual fight.
Basically a death zone (for players who do not fulfill a certain requirement) around a specific type of fight.

Similar things could be done with something that deals unavoidable damage, forcing people to bring a heavy frame into the area, because other frames would simply die on the way there.

That would allow to create content with certain benefits of instanced content (skill requirement to participate, certain frames being required --> creating an incentive to play all the different frames and therefore broadening the experience), but without actual instancing.

For example, should you add a perk system like Firefalls, the perks would not be bound to any one omniframe, but would be attached to your human character.
Or there could be perks for both.
(Perks for the frame itself would probably not be necessary, depending on what kind of equipment with what kind of effects the omniframes can equip in order to get perk like bonuses)
 
Last edited:
Jul 27, 2016
167
234
43
#7
Or there could be perks for both.
(Perks for the frame itself would probably not be necessary, depending on what kind of equipment with what kind of effects the omniframes can equip in order to get perk like bonuses)
I don't think Omniframe perks will be necessary. We're already getting a large degree of customization in making them, I imagine any perks could be built into the crafting process or made into pilot trees.
 
Likes: Mahdi
Jul 27, 2016
167
234
43
#8
While I'm all for areas emphasizing certain types of play, I think that should be the default. Enemies should use the terrain. Considering we're going to have an additional axis of movement they don't have access to, they need to use whatever terrain they can get. Raining hell upon us from the cliffs? Yes. Bulwarks and minefields to impede progress? Yes. Unavoidable damage I'm a bit iffy on.
 
Likes: Wraithbane

Tragedy

ARES Operator
Jul 26, 2016
39
64
18
California, America
#9
Or there could be perks for both.
(Perks for the frame itself would probably not be necessary, depending on what kind of equipment with what kind of effects the omniframes can equip in order to get perk like bonuses)
Perks was an example, I think having some form of pilot progression in a game where you can physically exit your Omniframe makes sense.

Pilot progression could even be in the form of "piloting experience" similar to what EVE has for piloting the largest ships. The longer you play, the more advanced Omniframe-types you unlock. Again, that's just another example - the specifics of pilot progression can be debated, I was just throwing out the general idea behind it.
 
Jul 27, 2016
167
234
43
#10
Perks was an example, I think having some form of pilot progression in a game where you can physically exit your Omniframe makes sense.

Pilot progression could even be in the form of "piloting experience" similar to what EVE has for piloting the largest ships. The longer you play, the more advanced Omniframe-types you unlock. Again, that's just another example - the specifics of pilot progression can be debated, I was just throwing out the general idea behind it.
I think tech advancement will be tied more to the world's tech level and how advanced our bases are, not personal progression-but I could be wrong.
 

Torgue_Joey

Kaiju Slayer
KAIJU 'SPLODER
Jul 27, 2016
1,123
2,703
113
Germany
#12
Perks was an example, I think having some form of pilot progression in a game where you can physically exit your Omniframe makes sense.

Pilot progression could even be in the form of "piloting experience" similar to what EVE has for piloting the largest ships. The longer you play, the more advanced Omniframe-types you unlock. Again, that's just another example - the specifics of pilot progression can be debated, I was just throwing out the general idea behind it.
SO SOMETHING LIKE ENTERING/EXITING FRAMES FASTER? THAT ONE BECAME FAMILIAR/ACCOMMODATED/EXPERIENCED WITH CERTAIN FRAMES TYPE.
 
Jul 26, 2016
1,461
2,441
113
43
#13
Pilot progression could even be in the form of "piloting experience" similar to what EVE has for piloting the largest ships. The longer you play, the more advanced Omniframe-types you unlock. Again, that's just another example - the specifics of pilot progression can be debated, I was just throwing out the general idea behind it.
Except that goes against what they are planning. You are describing vertical progression after all.

The current plan has it set to 3 different classes of Omniframe. [Heavy, medium, light]
That's why they used "omni" to describe them because the weapons/abilites can be stapled onto any omniframe.
Each class will have different base stats so that it's up to player to customize that.

Instead of having like in terms of firefall, 4 dreadnaught frames to cover different types of combat situations ... you'll have one frame which you will bolt on stuff to it for different roles.
 

Wraithbane

Firstclaimer
Jul 27, 2016
102
149
43
#14
I've never really been a fan of AC. But I loved the look and feel of Firefalls combat system (early version). I also love Doom 2016's combat system.


As far as weapons crafting and mods go, something like loadouts would be a great deal of fun. But it might be too complex for a limited Dev team.

 
Likes: Pandagnome
Aug 14, 2016
978
1,554
93
#15
In terms of pilot progression why not have things like faster hacking (the more you heck different systems the faster you get it) and weak point spotting (the more you research, fight, and/or kill one type of enemy the easier is for you to lock-on to it's weak points after you reprogram the targeting system) and NPC friendships (the more you talk to and befriend NPCs the more they like you to the point where they tell you about secrets and rumors they know about as well as give you gifts or lower the price of shop items. You have to do things like remember their birthdays or who their kids are and stuff.)

Some MMOs have slight dating sim elements in them to make it so players can befriend NPCs. Some NPCs will even have whole missions or even hidden shops that they only give to people who befriend them. Some of the you have to do missions for and other just have talk to as they remember conversations and actions you done. The only two MMOs that I can think of off the top of my head that has done this will are Anarchy Online and to a lesser extent Mabinogi, because in Mabinogi NPCs will forget things after a set number of days of not talking with them while as in Anarchy Online NPCs will remember you for years and even hold grudges.
 
Last edited:
Likes: Tragedy

Tragedy

ARES Operator
Jul 26, 2016
39
64
18
California, America
#16
Except that goes against what they are planning. You are describing vertical progression after all
Except that's not true, I actually discussed this in Chief Chat with Ronyn and Kern and they assured me there would be Vertical progression. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

There are few games that do not have vertical progression. I definitely do not want much vertical progression. However, the game would get pretty old-pretty fast and Kern realizes this - so there will be some amount of vertical progression -- Sorry!

Everything I've discussed has been measured and reasonable, adding more horizontal depth within minimal vertical impact. If you disagree with this and see a severe vertical impact to the game, then please by all means debate me - I am open to discussion.

What I am not open to however, is your attempts to completely shutdown discussion with information that isn't even accurate.
 
Likes: BunnyHunny

Tragedy

ARES Operator
Jul 26, 2016
39
64
18
California, America
#17
In terms of pilot progression why not have things like faster hacking (the more you heck different systems the faster you get it) and weak point spotting (the more you research, fight, and/or kill one type of enemy the easier is for you to lock-on to it's weak points after you reprogram the targeting system) and NPC friendships (the more you talk to and befriend NPCs the more they like you to the point where they tell you about secrets and rumors they know about as well as give you gifts or lower the price of shop items. You have to do things like remember their birthdays or who their kids are and stuff.)
Yes, this is exactly the type of stuff I'm talking about with Pilot Progression - the human element of the machine, it adds just a bit more depth to the game -- the ideas are great, thanks for the suggestions.
 
Jul 26, 2016
1,461
2,441
113
43
#18
Except that's not true, I actually discussed this in Chief Chat with Ronyn and Kern and they assured me there would be Vertical progression. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

There are few games that do not have vertical progression. I definitely do not want much vertical progression. However, the game would get pretty old-pretty fast and Kern realizes this - so there will be some amount of vertical progression -- Sorry!
well fuck. The description of this game made me think they didn't have it.
Oh well. Did they say where it would applied?
 

Ronyn

Commander
Staff member
Community Manager
Director of Marketing and Community
Jul 26, 2016
723
2,704
93
#20
Devtracker says otherwise.
There was some confusion in terminology very early on, but Grummz has since clarified that even though he will often refer to "horizontal progression" in Em-8ER (because expanding options is the larger focus) he does intend for the player to gain some amount of direct power increase through progression.